Why Document Freedom?
We live in an age in which paper documents increasingly get replaced by electronic records. Document freedom is fundamental for your documents to outlive the application you are currently using and allows you to choose and change applications freely.
"Previous proprietary document formats have become difficult or impossible to read within little more than a decade. There is no reason to believe this trend will not continue if allowed so to do. Without open standards for our documents we are likely to inflict a 'digital dark-age' on our descendants when they discover that they are unable to read any of the sources for their history, such as Government records, acts of Parliament, property title deeds, scientific research papers, and family histories. They will not forgive us if we fail to act to protect them now, but instead allow another generation of poorly specified proprietary standards to become widely adopted." - from UKUUG press release
"In the case of document format storage, a standard is truly important because formats (poor or not) that eventually lose implementations over time carve out blank spaces in our history once we can't read them properly. These same formats are also the source of certain information inequalities in society (e.g. those who can't obtain an implementation for financial, social or political reasons). This may not matter so much for Acme Inc's quarterly reports but it sure does for government, health and other socially vital information. Remember when some hurricane Katrina victims couldn't use the FEMA website because they had slightly older computers? This isn't a made up boogyman, this is stuff that bites us as a society fairly regularly. Now imagine a hundred years from now when we can still read the constitutions of our countries, research papers, poetry and other examples of human kind's great literary works that are hundreds or even thousands of years old ... but can't read the documents we're creating at the start of the 21st century. How will we learn from our history if we can't study it fully?
Getting proprietary formats out of the way as soon as possible so that we do not extend this mess any further than necessary is absolutely the responsible thing to do in light of our (hopeful) future." - Aaron Siego
Document Freedom and Democracy
Electronic records kept today include records of your government, such as tax and legal records or minutes of parliamentary proceedings. Making sure that such records remain in the control of the government is essential for a functioning democracy. The same is true for all interactions between citizens and their government, which should never depend on monopolies or on the proprietary product of a single company.
How to achieve Document Freedom?
Make a stand by saving your documents in ODF today. If your application does not support ODF, get one of the ODF supported applications like OpenOffice.org, KOffice, AbiWord, etc
ODF vs OOXML
Here's a quotation for the ages, from an Alex Brown comment on Andrew Updegrove's Standards Blog (scroll down) asking Brown if he'd agree that ODF was cleaner than OOXML:
"I'd go with that. I think ISO/IEC 26300 (ODF 1.0) can be compared to a neat house built on good foundations which is not finished; 29500 (OOXML) is a baroque cliffside castle replete with toppling towers, secret passages and ghosts: it is all too finished."
Now he tells us. Still, better late than never. And I couldn't have put it better myself. But if it's that bad, why is it an ISO standard? A standard with secret passages is a standard no one can implement unless they have a map and the keys. We don't have either. Only Microsoft does. Thanks, ISO, for this little anticompetitive joke. [...]
The public cares about ODF, because it realizes it will impact every one of us directly, and we see the obvious, that OOXML is a spoiler. This has nothing to do with market share.
Courtesy: PJ @ groklaw
The role of standards
For users, the benefit of a standard is to have compatibility between competing products in the market. As soon as there are two or several standards for the same applications, these are no longer standards, but mere technical specifications. If there had been only one ISO-approved format, it would have been a means to relaunch competition and innovation in the office productivity market. if there are several, the situation remains the same as in the past. The existence of a dual standard doesn't bring anything more than the absence of a standard. - Frédéric Couchet, APRIL, the main French advocacy association devoted to promote and protect Free/Libre Software.
Rigged ISO Process
There were 30 in the bed and the little one said, “Roll over, roll over.” So they all rolled over and 23 fell out.
There were 7 in the bed and the little one said, “Roll over, roll over.” So they all rolled over and 4 fell out.
There were 3 in the bed and the little one said, “Roll over, roll over.” So they all rolled over and 2 fell out…
There was 1 in the bed and the little one said, “Norway votes Yes!”
by Steve Pepper, the Chairman of the Norwegian mirror committee for SC34 (K185) for 13 years until resigning a couple of weeks ago in protest against Standard Norway’s decision to vote Yes.
On Barcamp Bangalore 6Edit
Anivar Aravind announced a session on Technopolitrics:The ooxml way , An Observation on ISO's banana standard on Barcamp Bangalore 6
When: 19th and 20th April
Where: BCB6 Summer Edition, Indian Institute of Management, Bangalore.
Candle Light Vigil for Document FreedomEdit
The Candle light vigil demands India to appeal ISO approval of ooxml based on its comments and no vote. We also demand the Department of IT to draft a clear national policy for the use of Free standards for data storage.
This programme is planned as a starting point for various events & awareness campaigns on Document freedom.
When: 15 April 2008, 6pm
Where: Near Corporation Circle, In front of the Townhall, Bengaluru
We request all user to
- do not send attachments in proprietary formats like .doc, .xls, .ppt
- We request people not to pollute their friends computers and the internet with unethically encoded documents.
- inform the users that they do not have right to decode the documents they themselves have written, if they use proprietary software
- distribute open office cds, containing apps with source code for windows.
- distribute live cds.
- pravi dot a at gmail dot com 998six34856five
- anivar at movingrepublic dot org 080-234three56zero6 /944nine0099zero8
- Vikram Vincent vincentvikram at swatantra dot org -- 9448810822
Participate in online discussions at fsug-bangalore mailing list
- Techies protest proprietary standards; seek policy- The Hindu - April 15
- Computer professionals hold candlelight vigil against proprietary standards -The Hindu- April 16th
- Protest in front of Town Hall for Document Freedom
- OOXML Protests Are Back, Lots of ODF FUD Seen Abound (Updatedx2)
Open Letter to Wipro, Infosys and TCSEdit
Pictures of Open Letter on College Notice Board
Open Document Format as the default Document standard for Institution Edit
- As a part of Document Freedom Day 2008, Fossers of Vidya, the Free Software Users Group, [Thrissur/VAST Vidya Academy] submitted a request to Principal of the institution requesting ODF as the institute standard. The request suggested for making ODF the default standard for all academic requirements such as project submission and seminar presentation making and for all institutional document archiving.
- Fossers of Vidya's Appeal, Vidya Vidya Academy of Science and Technology, Thrissur
OOXML: "The best Standard money can buy"
- India’s Continued Fight for Standards and Against OOXML
- Microsoft’s Latest Smear Campaign: ‘Disobedient’ Chairperson in India Targeted
- India's comments on BRM to ISO
- Policy challenges for “Open Standards”
- Microsoft files complaint on OOXML vote to apex office and Ministry of Consumer Affairs
- is ooxml really open?
- India votes NO for OOXML
- India and Brazil File Appeals Against OOXML Standardization
- South Africa appeals against OOXML, call your Standards Body now!
- Has OOXML Broken the British Standards Institution?
- Aaron Siego's reply to Miguel
- The Norway Vote - What really happened
- Sinclair's Syndrome - "It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it."
- ISO puts out a face-saving (it hopes) FAQ
- Alex Brown: OOXML is like a baroque castle with secret passages and crumbling towers
- Demonstration against OOXML
- UKUUG seeks legal advice on BSI's OOXML decision
- Six questions to national standardisation bodies
- FSFE concerned about quality of standardisation process
- EU investigating OOXML vote
- Microsoft's ISO win may worsen antitrust woes
- DE: German Foreign Ministry will not use ISO OOXML
- Praveen A
- Anivar Aravind
- Renuka Prasad B
- Vidya Shankar M H
- Baswaraj Ningashetty
- Chandra shekar B
- Chandrashekar B H
- Soumya M D
- Kishore A
- Sharath Shashidhar
- Jay Kiran# Sharath Shashidhar
- Komal Saraff
- Manjunath Maruthi
- Farahn khan
- Imtiyaz Quazi
- ArunKumar N Shiva
- Muneeb Ahmed
- Sudheendra ghorpade
- Narash J
- Nagaraja y
- Rajaram K
- Venkatram G R
- Raghwvendra Singh
- Nabakamal Das
- Ramesh Sheelvant
- Shah Naresh
- Shah Bhavesh
- Mahipal Kamanchi
- Reddy Krishna
- Sandeep Harkude
- Srinath P
- Shumba Rai
- Sony KOyalkar
- Mangala K S
- Vinayka Hampiholli
- Suhas D P
- Aman Kumar
- Ali Azgar
- Manali mankad
- Chandan C
- Udaya krishana P
- Rashmi S Bhat
- Shwetha G
- Pavan Kumar
- Ashok Kumar 17:10, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
- Shyam k
- Chandrasekharan Nair S
- BaijuMuthukadan 06:05, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
- Shivraj Kattimani